Home Instagram Icon-1 Linkedin Youtube

Distinguished Lecture with Staffan Müller-Wille is now available on YouTube

The last installment of our Distinguished Lecture Series (DLS) by Staffan Müller-Wille (Cambridge) on Sex and Gender in the History of the Life Sciences from 12. December 2024 is now available on YouTube.

The DLS is organized by the Integrated Research Training Group (iRTG) of the Collaborative Research Center (CRC) 1665 “Sexdiversity”.

Abstract: 

Science, technology and medicine are often portrayed as driving forces in the formulation and reinforcement of sex binaries and gender stereotypes based on these. At the same time, recent decades have seen a burgeoning literature on how life scientists, in the past and in the present, have been revealing queer patterns in the formation and variation of sex across all life forms. In this talk, I am going to review the history of understandings of sex and gender from antiquity to the mid-twentieth century. My argument will be that sex, and consequently gender, were always held as fluid categories allowing for endless variations and permutations. It is precisely because of that, however, that they always have been subject to normalizing discourses. Sex variation had to be reigned in, paradoxically, precisely because it seemed normal but not in line with prevailing or aspired norms.

Staffan Müller-Wille is Professor in History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences at the University of Cambridge and holds an Honorary Chair at the University of Lübeck. His research covers the history of the life sciences from the early modern period to the early twentieth century, with a focus on the history of natural history, anthropology, and genetics. Among his publications is a book co-authored with Hans-Jörg Rheinberger on The Cultural History of Heredity(2012) and further co-edited collections on Human Heredity in the Twentieth Century (2013), Heredity Explored: Between Public Domain and Experimental Science, 1850–1930 (2016), The Gene in the Postgenomic Era, co-authored with Hans-Jörg Rheinberger (2017), In the Shadow of the Tree: The Diagrammatics of Relatedness in Genealogy, Anthropology, and Genetics as Epistemic, Cultural, and Political Practice, co–authored with Marianne Sommer, Caroline Arni and Simon Teuscher (2024).

Teilen:

Kommentar verfassen

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert

Mehr Posts

Recap on the Distinguished Lecture: NeuroGenderings: Approaches for gender-equitable brain research on 13 February 2025

Another event in the Distinguished Lecture Series took place in the week before the major CRC 1665 meeting, the scientific retreat, with Professor Sigrid Schmitz from Humboldt University Berlin as guest speaker.
The public lecture NeuroGenderings: Approaches for gender-equitable brain research took place on Thursday, 13 February 2025 in the Institute for History of Medicine and Science Studies (IMGWF) in Lübeck and simultaneously via Webex. Sigrid Schmitz’s lecture focused on the transdisciplinary NeuroGenderings network, which facilitates collaboration between experts from the neurosciences, gender, queer and feminist studies, as well as science and technology studies.

2nd Retreat of CRC 1665 Sexdiversity at Plön Castle

All members of the Collaborative Research Centre „Sexdiversity “ (CRC 1665) gathered for the 2nd Retreat at the grand and breathtakingly beautiful Plön Castle. This two-day event, held on February 20-21, 2025, provided an excellent opportunity for collaboration, knowledge exchange, and productive discussions in a truly inspiring setting. As a member of the retreat organizing team, Svenja Denker, a doctoral candidate in the CRC, reflects on the event from her perspective.

Was bedeutet „Sex Contextualism“?

Die einzelnen Forschungsprojekte des SFB „Sexdiversity“ forschen zwar zu verschiedenen Themen und kommen aus unterschiedlichen Disziplinen – von Medizin und Molekulargenetik über Neurowissenschaften bis hin zu Wissenschaftsgeschichte. Aber sie eint eine gemeinsame Perspektive: Alle Projekte forschen auf Grundlage des sogenannten „Sex Contextualism“, also eines kontextuellen Konzepts von Körpergeschlecht.

Stellt diversitätssensible Medizin die Gendermedizin in Frage?

Gelegentlich wird die Behauptung aufgestellt, die Diversitätsforschung würde die Gendermedizin gefährden oder rückgängig machen. Diese Unterstellung erzeugt Unsicherheit über das Verhältnis von geschlechtsspezifischer Medizin und Diversitätsforschung im Gesundheitsbereich. Dadurch wird zudem ein Konkurrenzverhältnis unterstellt, was so in der Realität nicht existiert. Vielmehr handelt es sich, wie ich zeigen möchte, um komplementäre Bereiche, die produktiv aufeinander Bezug nehmen.

Nach oben scrollen