2nd Retreat of CRC 1665 Sexdiversity at Plön Castle

All members of the Collaborative Research Centre „Sexdiversity “ (CRC 1665) gathered for the 2nd Retreat at the grand and breathtakingly beautiful Plön Castle. This two-day event, held on February 20-21, 2025, provided an excellent opportunity for collaboration, knowledge exchange, and productive discussions in a truly inspiring setting. As a member of the retreat organizing team, Svenja Denker, a doctoral candidate in the CRC, reflects on the event from her perspective.

A Look at the Retreat Schedule

The retreat featured a schedule designed to promote collaboration and progress within CRC 1665. On Thursday morning, attendees registered for the event and received goodies bearing the CRC logo. The main program for the day included progress reports from all M- and S-Projects and associated doctoral projects. In brief eight-minute presentations, mostly doctoral candidates shared the achievements of their projects since the launch of the CRC. During the talk, everyone was tasked with summarizing last year’s work within a limited time frame. They were required to cover specific topics while ensuring that a broad audience from diverse disciplines could easily understand the content. Each report provided a comprehensive overview of the project team, collaborations, summarized objectives, current work, the focus of the PhD thesis, first-year experiences, and future perspectives. Overall, the short presentations were successful, with most participants adhering to the specified slides and time limits, which allowed everyone to gain insight into the CRC projects. Some questions were addressed immediately, while others were discussed in smaller groups during breaks, promoting additional networking within the CRC.



On this first day, each doctoral candidate was also given the opportunity for a 30-minute slot for a Thesis Advisory Committee (TAC) meeting with their supervisors. Later, the doctoral candidates gathered in a seminar room to share their impressions and experiences within the CRC. This discussion allowed the group to identify common topics of interest and generate initial ideas on how members could support each other and suggest potential improvements for the CRC. In the evening, many people gathered to chat and relax in the bar, which is situated in the former gatekeeper’s house of the castle.



On the second day, the program started with the General Assembly (GA). This included the speaker’s report, a proposal for the centrally managed funds plan for 2025, and updates on several Z-projects, including the integrated Research Training Group (iRTG), the data management project, and public affairs. Following this, there was a group photo of the CRC members. Further the GA gave room for general remarks, including critical perspectives on the CRC and its structure. A statement from the doctoral candidate group was given by its representatives and acknowledged by all parties.



Afterward, the attendees split into smaller groups. The CRC’s three thematic Working Groups, the Scientific Advisory Board (SAB), and the doctoral candidates each met in separate rooms. The doctoral candidates utilized this two-hour time slot for a feedback workshop. For this session, Professor Anne Skakkebaek from Aarhus University, who had previously spoken at the Summer School in 2024, provided insights on how feedback is approached in Denmark. The workshop began with a group activity, after which everyone reflected on the positive and negative feedback they had received in the past. Anne then shared various recommendations and methods for providing feedback. Participants practiced giving and receiving feedback in small groups, using notes they had prepared for each other’s presentations or moderation from the previous day. Finally, the group generated ideas on how they would like to give feedback within their cohort. Overall, this was an enriching workshop, and many thanks go to Anne for her assistance in planning and conducting it.

After lunch, everyone came back together into the plenum and listened to the report of the Scientific Advisory Board. They reflected on the work that has been done by the CRC and how it can be improved. Next, Dr. Eva Fuhry from the Medical and Pharmaceutical History Collection of the University of Kiel gave a short talk about their work and ideas on how a Sexdiversity Exhibition could enrich the CRC and make the information available to the public. With this, the retreat came to an end, and after reflecting on the last two days, people started their way home.

Throughout the retreat, researchers engaged in stimulating discussions, presenting their latest findings and exchanging valuable feedback. Many breaks were used for networking, everyone took advantage of being in one place for once. The feedback workshop offered young researchers an opportunity to develop their skills and expand their academic network, while the general assembly and working group meetings facilitated strategic planning for the CRC’s future projects.

A Stunning Location: Plön Castle

Plön Castle, one great landmarks of Northern Germany, served as the perfect venue for our retreat. Its picturesque architecture, serene surroundings, and outstanding hospitality created an ideal atmosphere for focused academic discussions. The castle staff provided exceptional service, ensuring a seamless experience throughout our stay. The delicious meals, featuring exquisite cuisine, added a special touch to the retreat, allowing participants to enjoy both intellectual and culinary delights.



As a highlight, attendees were offered two guided castle tours. These tours provided fascinating insights into the history and architecture of the castle, including a visit to the beautifully restored chapel. The blend of historical ambiance and modern academic exchange made the retreat even more memorable.

Looking Ahead

The 2nd Retreat at Plön Castle was a resounding success, strengthening collaborations and inspiring new research directions. As we continue our work within CRC 1665, we look forward to future gatherings that will build upon the momentum generated at this retreat. A big thank you to all organizers, speakers, and participants who contributed to making this event a truly enriching experience!

Svenja Denker

Teilen:

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert

Mehr Posts

Five Days of Science, AI and Questioning Everything: iRTG Summer School 2026

From 28 September to 2 October 2026, doctoral researchers and MD students from Collaborative Research Centre 1665 “Sexdiversity” gathered for the annual iRTG Summer School, themed “Scientific Writing Across Disciplines – AI and Good Scientific Practice.”

Beyond writing workshops and conversations about technology, the week gave us a chance to step away from everyday research routines, exchange ideas across disciplines and spend time together outside the lab or office.

Michel Foucault zur Geschichte von Intersex. Was folgt auf die Medikalisierung?

Das nun auch auf Deutsch vorgelegte Buch aus dem Nachlass von Michel Foucault Die Hermaphroditen ist ein Forschungsbericht. Im Zusammenhang mit seinen Studien zur Geschichte der Sexualität ist Foucault auf mehrere Fälle von Menschen mit uneindeutigem Geschlecht gestoßen. Diese Fälle interessierten ihn besonders, weil sich an ihnen zeigte, wie Gesellschaften nicht nur das sexuelle Verhalten, sondern auch die Geschlechtsidentität kontrollierten und einem Regime unterwarfen.

„The biggest barrier is finding someone that respects me“: Zur Diskriminierung von nicht-binären Personen durch die psychologische Gesundheitsversorgung

Für ihre Bachelorarbeit im Studiengang Psychologie an der Universität zu Lübeck hat Carlotta Behre einen systematischen Review zur Diskriminierung von nicht-binären Personen in der psychologischen Gesundheitsversorgung verfasst. Ende Juli 2026 hat sie die Abschlussarbeit unter dem Titel „Diskriminierung von nicht-binären Personen in der psychologischen Gesundheitsversorgung – Ein systematischer Review“ eingereicht. Dieser Beitrag gibt einen Überblick über ihre zentralen Fragestellungen und Ergebnisse.

At a Glance: Sex Differences in Health and Disease – Highlights from the EMBO/EMBL Symposium 2026

What do fly-intestines, artificial blood vessels, and X-chromosome inactivation have in common? That’s right, sex differences!
These and many other topics were discussed at the 2026 EMBO/EMBL (European Molecular Biology Organization/ European Molecular Biology Laboratory) Symposium “Sex Differences in Health and Disease” in Heidelberg, Germany. CRC 1665 researchers Nadine Hornig, Prathiksha Ramesh, and I, Katharina Dörner, attended four days full of talks, discussions, and fun group activities at the EMBL Advanced Training Centre.

Nach oben scrollen