Home Instagram Icon-1 Linkedin Youtube

Distinguished Lecture with Staffan Müller-Wille is now available on YouTube

The last installment of our Distinguished Lecture Series (DLS) by Staffan Müller-Wille (Cambridge) on Sex and Gender in the History of the Life Sciences from 12. December 2024 is now available on YouTube.

The DLS is organized by the Integrated Research Training Group (iRTG) of the Collaborative Research Center (CRC) 1665 “Sexdiversity”.

Abstract: 

Science, technology and medicine are often portrayed as driving forces in the formulation and reinforcement of sex binaries and gender stereotypes based on these. At the same time, recent decades have seen a burgeoning literature on how life scientists, in the past and in the present, have been revealing queer patterns in the formation and variation of sex across all life forms. In this talk, I am going to review the history of understandings of sex and gender from antiquity to the mid-twentieth century. My argument will be that sex, and consequently gender, were always held as fluid categories allowing for endless variations and permutations. It is precisely because of that, however, that they always have been subject to normalizing discourses. Sex variation had to be reigned in, paradoxically, precisely because it seemed normal but not in line with prevailing or aspired norms.

Staffan Müller-Wille is Professor in History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences at the University of Cambridge and holds an Honorary Chair at the University of Lübeck. His research covers the history of the life sciences from the early modern period to the early twentieth century, with a focus on the history of natural history, anthropology, and genetics. Among his publications is a book co-authored with Hans-Jörg Rheinberger on The Cultural History of Heredity(2012) and further co-edited collections on Human Heredity in the Twentieth Century (2013), Heredity Explored: Between Public Domain and Experimental Science, 1850–1930 (2016), The Gene in the Postgenomic Era, co-authored with Hans-Jörg Rheinberger (2017), In the Shadow of the Tree: The Diagrammatics of Relatedness in Genealogy, Anthropology, and Genetics as Epistemic, Cultural, and Political Practice, co–authored with Marianne Sommer, Caroline Arni and Simon Teuscher (2024).

Teilen:

Kommentar verfassen

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert

Mehr Posts

Recht und Versorgungslücken: Auswirkungen des BSG-Urteils vom 19. Oktober 2023 auf die medizinische Versorgung von trans* und nicht-binären Personen

Die Diagnose Geschlechtsinkongruenz beschreibt die Nicht-Übereinstimmung zwischen dem bei der Geburt zugewiesenen Geschlecht und dem eigenen, erlebten Geschlecht. Menschen mit dieser Diagnose haben grundsätzlich Anspruch auf geschlechtsangleichende Maßnahmen, da diese medizinisch notwendig sind, um den oft massiven Leidensdruck zu lindern. Seit Ende 2023 gibt es jedoch neue Herausforderungen: Viele Krankenkassen übernehmen die Kosten für geschlechtsangleichende Behandlungen nicht mehr wie zuvor.

Distinguished Lecturer Series – Daphna Joel Lecture Now Available on YouTube

In this lecture, Daphna Joel challenges the long-held assumption of a sex binary in neuroscience and psychology. Drawing on her research, she demonstrates that most human brains are unique “mosaics” of features more common in either women or men. This finding suggests that sex alone explains very little about brain structure or behavior, calling for a reevaluation of how we study and understand sex and gender in the brain.

Why the Brain Isn’t Binary: DLS Recap on Rethinking Sex and Gender as a Mosaic

The lecture introduced central concepts in sex-based brain research and gendered neuroscience, with a focus on rethinking traditional binary models of the brain. Through vivid examples and data-driven insights, Professor Joel explored how unsupervised algorithms, anomaly detection, and brain architecture analyses can be used to challenge conventional perspectives and offer alternative interpretations of brain clustering methods. Participants were encouraged to reflect on how categories such as male and female are stereotypically constructed, applied, and questioned within both scientific and social frameworks. 

Den Dialog praktizieren: Molekularbiologie und Kulturwissenschaft entwickeln gemeinsam Perspektiven auf Geschlecht

Molekularbiologie trifft auf Kulturwissenschaft – und umgekehrt. Unser erstes Treffen fand in einem Besprechungsraum eines Kieler Labors für Humangenetik statt – vor genau acht Jahren. Heute arbeiten wir im SFB „Sexdiversity“ kollaborativ zusammen: Doch was kann eine Kulturwissenschaftlerin von molekularbiologischer Forschung verstehen – und warum sollten wir überhaupt zusammenarbeiten, wenn unsere Zugänge, Gegenstände, Methoden und Wissenspraktiken so unterschiedlich sind?

Nach oben scrollen