Katie Sutton (Australian National University, Canberra) hat am 17. Oktober 2024 den Auftaktvortrag für das Wintersemester 2024/2025 am Lübecker Institut für Medizingeschichte und Wissenschaftsforschung (IMGWF) gehalten. Die Veranstaltung war Teil des Institutskolloquiums und wurde vom SFB „Sexdiversity“ organisiert. Der Vortragstitel lautete „Technologie of Sex: Humanizing the Clinical Gaze in Interwar Social Hygiene Film“.
Sex research in the early-twentieth century German-speaking world was a wide-ranging and interdisciplinary project, and by the 1920s popular interest in this booming field was facilitated by the exciting technological possibilities of film, as sex reform activists, doctors, feminists and advocacy organizations forged productive alliances with commercial studios. This talk argues that interwar Aufklärungsfilme were crucial in democratizing interwar sexual science, depicting doctors as not simply authoritative experts, but as sympathetic, accessible and even vulnerable mediators of the latest sex research. They show doctor-scientists taking their lectures and life-lessons out of the traditional clinics and laboratories into spaces such as nightclubs, funfairs, and domestic homes, at times ceding some of their authority to newly recognised social actors such as female medical students or gender-diverse subjects. Film, queer and affect theorists emphasize how the embodied experience of cinemagoing can foster unique forms of identification and empathy, from “prosthetic memories” (Landsberg) to “embodied affects” (Rutherford). We examine how these shifts worked to humanize the clinical gaze and gesture towards more emancipatory futures, even as we also consider ways in which these sources remain ethically troubling for historians of gender and sexuality today.
Katie Sutton is Associate Professor of German and Gender Studies at the Australian National University and a cultural historian of the German-speaking world. Working at the intersection of gender, sexuality, medicine and popular culture, Sutton’s work focuses particularly on queer andtrans histories and cultures, sexual science and psychoanalysis. They are author of Sexuality in Modern German History (Bloomsbury, 2023); Sex between Body and Mind: Psychoanalysis and Sexology in the German-Speaking World, 1890s-1930s (Michigan UP, 2019); and The Masculine Woman in Weimar Germany (Berghahn, 2011). Sutton’s research has been supported by the Australian Research Council, DAAD, and British Academy/Leverhulme, including a current collaborative ARC Discovery Project with Professor Birgit Lang at the University of Melbourne on photography and film in early sexual science on which this presentation is based.
Glasflasche für ‚Progynon‘-Tabletten, Vereinigtes Königreich, 1928–1948 (Wellcome Collection, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0) Die Sexualhormonforschung, so steht es in nahezu allen wissenschaftshistorischen Darstellungen, begann mit
The Distinguished Lecture with Anelis Kaiser Trujillo is now online in full length. Although AI has increasingly dominated scientific research, neuroscience continues to captivate both academic and public interest. A central question remains: how does biological ‘sex’ influence behavior, cognition, and communication?
Professor Kaiser Trujillo’s talk provided a compelling overview of the intersections between neuroscience and gender studies. Drawing on her long-standing work at the interface of these disciplines, she addressed the enduring scientific and political question of how a biological understanding of sex relates to cognition, communication, and behavior. The lecture critically examined how sex and gender are operationalized in neuroimaging studies (particularly fMRI) and how these practices shape, and often constrain, the ways in which human diversity is understood in brain research.
Der UK Supreme Court, das höchste britische Gericht, hat am 16. April 2025 geurteilt, dass im britischen Gleichstellungsgesetz (Equality Act von 2010) unter „Geschlecht“ das “biologische Geschlecht“ gemeint sei, welches ausschließlich männlich oder weiblich bedeute. Entsprechend dürfen in Frauenquoten trans Frauen nicht mitgezählt werden. Trans Männer dürfen nicht in Männerabteilungen von Krankenhäusern liegen und auch andere „single sex spaces“ wie Toiletten oder Umkleideräume seien für Angehörige des jeweiligen Geburtsgeschlechts reserviert. Für Angehörige von geschlechtlichen Minderheiten, also für trans, inter und nichtbinäre (TIN*) Personen, die in dem Gerichtsverfahren offenbar gar nicht angehört wurden, schafft das offensichtlich Probleme.
