Home Instagram Icon-1 Linkedin Youtube

New Article on Mandatory Genetic Testing for Women Athletes

Andrew Sinclair, a member of the scientific advisory board of CRC 1665, recently published a critical analysis of the newly proposed mandatory genetic tests for women athletes by World Athletics. Sinclair is notably the scientist who discovered the relevant gene involved in sex development back in 1990, giving him unique expertise on the topic.

World Athletics asserts the SRY gene is a reliable proxy for determining biological sex. But biological sex is much more complex, with chromosomal, gonadal (testis/ovary), hormonal and secondary sex characteristics all playing a role.

He argues that biological sex is complex and cannot be reduced to a single gene or marker. The SRY gene, discovered in 1990, plays a key role in sex determination but does not capture the full spectrum of human sex development.

Thus, genetic testing alone does not provide a clear or fair criterion for determining who can compete as a woman in sports. Many intersex variations and variations of sex development exist, and these genetic variations often do not correlate straightforwardly with athletic performance. The policy risks unfairly excluding athletes based on outdated or overly simplistic scientific assumptions. 

The article calls for a reconsideration of policies that rely heavily on genetic testing for sex verification, urging sports governing bodies to adopt more nuanced, scientifically grounded, and ethically responsible approaches.

Link to the full article: https://theconversation.com/world-athletics-mandatory-genetic-test-for-women-athletes-is-misguided-i-should-know-i-discovered-the-relevant-gene-in-1990-262367

 

Kommentar verfassen

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert

Teilen:

Mehr Posts

Geschlechterordnung per Dekret: Trumps Executive Order zur Zweigeschlechtlichkeit

Am 20. Januar 2025, dem ersten Tag seiner zweiten Amtszeit, unterzeichnete US-Präsident Donald Trump die Executive Order 14168 mit dem Titel Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government (Link). Es handelt sich um ein wirkmächtiges Dokument, das das Leben vieler Menschen prägt – mit dem Anspruch, Körpergeschlecht eindeutig zu definieren. Dabei vermischen sich ideologische Vorstellungen, politische Maßnahmen und wissenschaftliche Argumentationen.
In unserem Beitrag nehmen wir die darin gezeichneten Vorstellungen von Körpergeschlecht kritisch in den Blick.

„Kampf der Geschlechter“ und „Krieg der Gonaden“: Wissenschaftshistorische Bemerkungen zur Entstehung des Konzeptes der Sexualhormone

Diese „neue Physiologie“ der Regulation durch leistungsstarke Agentien war untrennbar mit den Potentialen der pharmaindustriellen Produktion verbunden. Hormone waren zugleich Naturstoffe und Arzneimittel. Vor allem nach dem Ersten Weltkrieg entstanden enge Beziehungen zwischen biochemischer Forschung und industrieller Herstellung. Das Ziel der pharmazeutischen Großunternehmen war die Produktion reiner, standardisierter Substanzen und deren molekulare Umgestaltung zur Gewinnung neuer Produkte. Die Herstellung von Wirksamkeit war dabei immer auch die Herstellung von Marktfähigkeit. Das endokrinologische Körperwissen war unmittelbar an eine pharmaindustrielle Ökonomie gebunden.

Distinguished Lecturer Series: Sex/Gender & Diversity in Neuroscience

The Distinguished Lecture with Anelis Kaiser Trujillo is now online in full length. Although AI has increasingly dominated scientific research, neuroscience continues to captivate both academic and public interest. A central question remains: how does biological ‘sex’ influence behavior, cognition, and communication?

Bridging Disciplines: Neuroscience Meets Gender Studies at CRC 1665 Distinguished Lecturer Series

Professor Kaiser Trujillo’s talk provided a compelling overview of the intersections between neuroscience and gender studies. Drawing on her long-standing work at the interface of these disciplines, she addressed the enduring scientific and political question of how a biological understanding of sex relates to cognition, communication, and behavior. The lecture critically examined how sex and gender are operationalized in neuroimaging studies (particularly fMRI) and how these practices shape, and often constrain, the ways in which human diversity is understood in brain research.

Nach oben scrollen